http://www.canyonco.org/sheriff/ http://www.canyonco.org/default.aspx http://www.facebook.com/pages/Canyon-County-Sheriffs-Office/102232009816945 http://www.elected4sheriff.org/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAEi6IhuBPY http://www.idahopress.com http://www.sheriffalerts.com/cap_main.php?office=54806 http://canyoncountyrepublicans.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Canyon-County-Republican-Central-Committee/201058113268768 www.idahostatesman.com http://www.canyoncountyrepublicanwomen.com/
Robert D. Muse
Constitutional Sheriff Candidate
Idaho Criminal & Civil Justice.Net
2012-VOTE NO SB1325
3/8/2012 Bill pulled from Senate

 

 

 

2012-VOTE NO SB1325
3/8/2012 Bill pulled from Senate

I would like to thank all the legislature, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, bail agencies, bail agents, law enforcement and citizens who refused to loose there first amendment rights.

A victory for the law bidding citizen of this state and country.

This is another example why you do not sacrifice your individuals constitutional rights because of  the minority of citizens who violate only ethics and integrity and not the law.

It is time to stop the passage of laws that restrict commerce and ownership of personal and private property.

Vote no on Credit Bail Bond Bill SB1325. This eliminates your 1st amendment rights as citizens.

 

Do we need to discuss and define liberalism and socialism, and fascism or American individual exceptional-ism?

 

Did you know a person released on credit attends court at the same rate as no credit?

http://www.beneficialbailbonds.com/index.html

Why am I going to be discriminated against when others can still loan money after this bill is passed by the very language in the bill?  One company can but another cannot?

 Is this another attempt by the PBAI an association with a bias to stop new competition through the removal of personal constitutional liberties?

No one has the right to tell me who I can loan money to for legal or any services as a private citizen.

The bill has several major flaws in addition to loss of my 1st amendment rights were just affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court January 21, 2011 under campaign reform.

If a client writes a bad check, refer to maker, redeposit - Does invalidate the affidavit that would be turned into the Sheriff with bail bond?

Do I lose my license by a judge, Sheriff, or the Insurance commissioner who is the regulator?

There are good and bad agents, there are good and bad judges, there are good and bad police, there are good and bad Presidents.

I will use all my energy and network contacts to stop this. They have

Was the dramatically changed language voted by the general membership assembly at last semi-annual meeting?

Is this the integrity, ethics, and morality they are promoting through the loss of individual constitutional rights is for others not the elected officers of the PBAI?

Is this another example of socialism and fascism working together?

They must have borrowed it from the extreme liberal left movement from the Wall Street protestors... or are they the greedy 1%%%? You decide........

How can any person who took an oath to defend the constitution accept such a law?

By the sound logic of this bill SB 1325then all OR own recognizance made by judges should be illegal also.

 Is this not a no paid bail or free bail? These judges should also loose their position.

So does this mean the government can do what it wants but the private citizen who is licensed to write bail cannot exercise his right to share his personal, corporate or private property?

So when the jails fill up the sheriff is going to ask the judges to release defendants on "OR" or free bail.

So is credit bail under this logic is inferior to free bail?

 What school or education of thought has propelled this logic because but it does not add up?

So under this logic we must all surrender each of our individual constitutional rights for the few?

Do we need to discuss and define liberalism and socialism, and fascism or American individual exceptional-ism?

May be we should start with a sworn and a oral and signed statement to protect and defend the constitution by all members?

We affirm the principles of inherent individual rights upon which these United States of America were founded in the 1st Amendment:

That each individual is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are the rights to life, liberty, property (CASH?) and the pursuit of happiness;

That the freedom to own, use, exchange, control, protect, and freely dispose of property(CASH?) is a natural, necessary and inseparable extension of the individual’s unalienable rights;

That the legitimate function of government is to secure these rights through the preservation of domestic tranquility, the maintenance of a strong national defense, and the promotion of equal justice for all;

That history makes clear that left unchecked, it is the nature of government to usurp the liberty of its citizens and eventually become a major violator of the people’s rights; and
That, therefore, it is essential to bind government with the chains of the Constitution and carefully divide and jealously limit government powers to those assigned by the consent of the governed.

Asolution to credit bailwithout loosing our individual constitutional rights to loan any citizen money for a bond can be constructed in a meaningful method. The balance of loan for credit bail is no longer due after exoneration of bail bond. The remaining balance can be used for itemized income tax operational bad debt expenses to reduce personal taxes at the end of the tax year. This methodology saves our 1st amendment right and restores a conservative value ready to be removed by the liberal establishment of the bail industry. Follow the example of the U.S. Supreme Court.

“On Jan. 21, 2011 the US Supreme Court announced a landmark decision establishing for the first time that corporations enjoy the same First Amendment free-speech rights as individuals. Instead of a tightly regulated level playing field, the conservative wing of the Supreme Court has pointed America toward a messy "marketplace of ideas." In Justice Anthony Kennedy's view, if corporate speech presents a threat of undue influence in American politics, the proper response in the spirit of the First Amendment is to meet it with even more speech.”

This 2012 Idaho credit bail legislation is same assault on our 1st amendment constitutional rights to give money to citizens who need financial support.

How can a campaign contribution be the same as credit bail? It is a conservative right wing expression of our 1st amendment right to use our speech to give our financial support to any citizen supporting this constitutional choice in these United States.

The credit bail legislation wants to tightly regulate the playing field instead of promoting the marketplace of ideas.

This action is a symbol of the liberal establishment wing of the bail industry trying to eliminate your constitutional rights and grow government criminal statutes at the expense of taking away our 1st amendment rights.

The credit bail legislation is designed to eliminate start up business and centralize the power to a few liberal establishment individuals who are owners of bail operations, representatives of select sureties in Idaho.

This legislation will create monopolies instead of fair competition. The disguise of fairness and equality are just illusions that will cause the removal of the small independent bail agencies and other sureties in this state.

This 2012 Idaho credit bail legislation eliminates our 1st amendment right to defend a citizen by providing financial assistance (1st amendment right) to those not convicted of a statutory crime.

 What is the difference between a judge granting free bail (own recognizance) and credit bail?

Is this yet another example of the 1st amendment? Why should the government be the only agent for reduced bail and not the private citizen who has been issued a license as operational component of the judicial system?

My solution maintains choice for the quality of financial decision making, itemized operational expenses, and promotes conservative values that are the American way of tradition and practice of our 1st amendment declared in the constitution and supported by the Supreme Court.

Never comprise our Constitutional Liberty and Bill of Rights for ethics, bylaws and profits.

 Forever proud and free and we all share a dream.

This is an effort to educate why this legislation is null and void with no force of law if passed as violation of the first amendment that the US Supreme has stated in campaign funding reform that states you can spend and loan your money for any legal purpose.

This credit bail legislation is a violation of the constitution and there  is no escape clause for anyone to do what they want to form unconstitutional Idaho law against the people of this state.

 Respect our rights - but instead this legislation goes around our rights because of constitutional ignorance by the many that forgot the principle and continue to violate the oath of office.

Lobbyist,

Robert Muse

(208) 697-2167

2012 Canyon County Sheriff Candidate